Fairness-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Educational Assessment: Counterfactual Policy Regularization under Measurement Bias

Authors

  • Alice Morgan
  • James Turner
  • Emma Clarke

Keywords:

adaptive assessment, reinforcement learning, algorithmic fairness, computerized adaptive testing, counterfactual consistency, educational measurement

Abstract

Personalized educational assessment can reduce test burden by adapting item selection to a learner’s evolving knowledge state, but a policy that optimizes efficiency alone may convert measurement bias into systematic differences in question difficulty and test length across demographic groups. This paper formulates adaptive assessment as a constrained sequential decision problem and introduces CF-Q, a lightweight fairness-aware reinforcement-learning method that combines (i) group-wise calibration of a biased initial ability proxy, (ii) counterfactual Q-consistency that couples value estimates under protected-attribute swaps, and (iii) a dual variable that penalizes residual action disparity. The method is evaluated in a controlled three-skill item-response simulation designed to isolate algorithmic behavior under a protected-group measurement barrier. Across three independent seeds and 2,700 held-out simulated learners, CF-Q reduced the conditional difficulty-exposure gap from 0.267 to 0.073 (72.8%) relative to efficiency-only Q-learning, while maintaining similar ability-estimation error (RMSE 0.413 versus 0.407). It also reduced the conditional test-length gap from 0.467 to 0.227. The results show that fairness constraints can be integrated directly into the adaptive policy rather than applied only as a post-hoc audit, yielding a transparent accuracy–efficiency–fairness trade-off suitable for educational assessment research.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bian, M., Wang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2024). Explainable supplier risk prediction for critical telecommunications infrastructure procurement: An empirical XGBoost–SHAP framework. Social Science and Management, 1(1), 64-77.

[2] Shang, W., & Chen, T. (2024). PrefixKD-Edge: Real-time locomotion-intent prediction with prefix self-distillation on lightweight temporal networks. In-novation and Technology Studies, 1(1), 30–38.

[3] Rhee, M., Zou, J., & Qin, Y. (2024). CLARITY: A closed loop framework for duplicate aware failure prediction and budgeted automated remediation in cloud infrastructure. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 76-85.

[4] Lin, Y., Wang, Y., & Bian, M. (2024). XOR EW: An explainable and cost aware artificial intelligence framework for operational risk early warning in fi-nancial institutions. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 94-102.

[5] Zhao, W., & Wang, B. (2022). CAPA: A prediction‑driven autoscaling framework for SLO‑aware cloud‑native machine learning inference. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 4(1), 8-16.

[6] Wang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2023). AERIS: Adaptive executor scoped resource management for privacy preserving data processing in Apache Spark. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 25-33.

[7] Y. Cheng, ‘When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT,’ Psychometrika, vol. 74, pp. 619–632, 2009.

[8] A. T. Corbett and J. R. Anderson, ‘Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acqui-sition of procedural knowledge,’ User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 4, pp. 253–278, 1994.

[9] C. Piech et al., ‘Deep knowledge tracing,’ in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, 2015.

[10] S. Pandey and G. Karypis, ‘A self-attentive model for knowledge tracing,’ arXiv:1907.06837, 2019.

[11] A. Ghosh, N. Heffernan, and A. S. Lan, ‘Context-aware attentive knowledge tracing,’ in Proc. 26th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2020, pp. 2330–2339.

[12] J. Kuzilek, M. Hlosta, and Z. Zdrahal, ‘Open University Learning Analytics dataset,’ Scientific Data, vol. 4, Art. no. 170171, 2017, doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.171.

[13] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2018.

[14] V. Mnih et al., ‘Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,’ Nature, vol. 518, pp. 529–533, 2015.

[15] J. Achiam, D. Held, A. Tamar, and P. Abbeel, ‘Constrained policy optimiza-tion,’ in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, PMLR 70, 2017, pp. 22–31.

[16] S. Jabbari, M. Joseph, M. Kearns, J. Morgenstern, and A. Roth, ‘Fairness in reinforcement learning,’ in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, PMLR 70, 2017, pp. 1617–1626.

[17] M. Joseph, M. Kearns, J. H. Morgenstern, and A. Roth, ‘Fairness in learning: Classic and contextual bandits,’ in Advances in Neural Information Pro-cessing Systems 29, 2016.

[18] Q. Fang and W. Liu, ‘HARLA-ED: Resolving information asymmetry and enhancing algorithmic symmetry in intelligent educational assessment via hybrid reinforcement learning,’ Symmetry, vol. 18, Art. no. 58, 2026, doi: 10.3390/sym18010058.

[19] B. Tang, S. Li, and C. Zhao, ‘Reinforcement learning framework for com-puterized adaptive testing using multi armed bandit approach,’ Scientific Re-ports, vol. 16, Art. no. 7441, 2026.

[20] J. Shin and O. Bulut, ‘Building an intelligent recommendation system for personalized test scheduling in computerized assessments: A reinforcement learning approach,’ Behavior Research Methods, vol. 54, pp. 216–232, 2022.

[21] B. Fahad Mon, A. Wasfi, M. Hayajneh, A. Slim, and N. Abu Ali, ‘Rein-forcement learning in education: A literature review,’ Informatics, vol. 10, no. 3, Art. no. 74, 2023.

[22] A. Riedmann, P. Schaper, and B. Lugrin, ‘Reinforcement learning in educa-tion: A systematic literature review,’ International Journal of Artificial Intel-ligence in Education, vol. 35, pp. 2669–2723, 2025.

[23] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recom-mendations. Washington, DC, USA, 2023.

[24] Y. Gal and Z. Ghahramani, ‘Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Repre-senting model uncertainty in deep learning,’ in Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Machine Learning, 2016, pp. 1050–1059.

[25] C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, ‘Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks,’ in Proc. 34th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, 2017, pp. 1126–1135.

[26] J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov, ‘Proxi-mal policy optimization algorithms,’ arXiv:1707.06347, 2017.

[27] Yue, X., & Zhu, R. (2024). An explainable hybrid machine learning frame-work for cash-flow-conditioned multi-horizon liquidity risk early warning: An SME-oriented benchmark study. World Journal of Management Science, 2(1), 63-72.

[28] Jiao, Y., & Liang, Y. (2024). An integrated process mining and explainable machine learning framework for bottleneck and internal control risk detection in the multi entity financial close. Social Science and Management, 1(3), 96-107.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03