Continuous-Time Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for Financial Fraud Detection

Authors

  • Karen Cheung
  • Ho Man Tse
  • Alice Kwok

Keywords:

financial fraud detection, heterogeneous graph, temporal graph, continuous time, contrastive learning, self-supervised learning, anti-money laundering

Abstract

Financial fraud unfolds as a stream of typed interactions whose timing, relation semantics, and structural context jointly determine risk. Snapshot-based heterogeneous graph models preserve relation types but quantize time, whereas continuous-time temporal graph models usually emphasize event order without explicitly separating relation-specific behavioral states. This paper proposes CT-HGCL, a continuous-time heterogeneous graph contrastive learning framework centered on an event-driven multi-timescale state bank. For each node and relation, CT-HGCL maintains exponentially decayed count and amount states at fast and slow time scales; the state is updated only when an event arrives, so no temporal snapshots are required. A type-aware event encoder combines these causal states with endpoint types, relation identity, amount, absolute time, and inter-event gaps. Self-supervised pre-training forms two semantics-preserving stochastic views of each event state and optimizes an InfoNCE objective before weighted supervised fine-tuning. The design directly follows the continuous-time direction motivated by recent dynamic heterogeneous fraud research while replacing snapshot recurrence with exact-time state evolution. On a controlled event-stream benchmark containing 18,480 typed transactions, 4,195 active nodes, four relation types, and 480 fraud events organized into 120 collusive rings, CT-HGCL achieves 0.9596±0.0045 AUC-ROC over three random seeds. More importantly, at 5% labeled training data it reaches 0.8963±0.0253 AUC, compared with 0.8785±0.0576 for the same continuous-time heterogeneous encoder trained from scratch. Removing relation/type information reduces AUC to 0.9375±0.0046, showing that temporal continuity alone is insufficient. These results support continuous-time, heterogeneity-aware self-supervision as a practical route for label-scarce fraud detection.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Weber et al., “Anti-money laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with graph convolutional networks for financial forensics,” arXiv:1908.02591, 2019.

[2] E. Altman, J. Blanuša, L. von Niederhäusern, B. Egressy, A. Anghel, and K. Atasu, “Realistic synthetic financial transactions for anti-money laundering models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 29851–29874, 2023, doi: 10.52202/075280-1300.

[3] T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.

[4] W. Hamilton, Z. Ying, and J. Leskovec, “Inductive representation learning on large graphs,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 1024–1034, 2017.

[5] P. Veličković, G. Cucurull, A. Casanova, A. Romero, P. Liò, and Y. Bengio, “Graph attention networks,” International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.

[6] X. Wang et al., “Heterogeneous graph attention network,” in Proc. World Wide Web Conf., 2019, pp. 2022–2032, doi: 10.1145/3308558.3313562.

[7] Z. Hu, Y. Dong, K. Wang, and Y. Sun, “Heterogeneous graph transformer,” in Proc. Web Conf., 2020, pp. 2704–2710, doi: 10.1145/3366423.3380027.

[8] M. Schlichtkrull, T. N. Kipf, P. Bloem, R. van den Berg, I. Titov, and M. Welling, “Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks,” in The Semantic Web—ESWC 2018, pp. 593–607, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_38.

[9] Y. Jiao, H. Fan, X. Yue, W. Ping, T. Sun, and J. Wang, “Dynamic heterogeneous graph contrastive learning for uncovering collusive financial fraud,” Scientific Reports, vol. 16, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-58938-5.

[10] A. Pareja et al., “EvolveGCN: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs,” Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 5363–5370, 2020, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5984.

[11] D. Xu, C. Ruan, E. Korpeoglu, S. Kumar, and K. Achan, “Inductive representation learning on temporal graphs,” arXiv:2002.07962, 2020.

[12] E. Rossi, B. Chamberlain, F. Frasca, D. Eynard, F. Monti, and M. Bronstein, “Temporal graph networks for deep learning on dynamic graphs,” arXiv:2006.10637, 2020.

[13] A. Sankar, Y. Wu, L. Gou, W. Zhang, and H. Yang, “DySAT: Deep neural representation learning on dynamic graphs via self-attention networks,” in Proc. 13th ACM Int. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining, 2020, pp. 519–527.

[14] S. Huang et al., “Temporal graph benchmark for machine learning on temporal graphs,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, 2023, doi: 10.52202/075280-0099.

[15] J. Gastinger et al., “TGB 2.0: A benchmark for learning on temporal knowledge graphs and heterogeneous graphs,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, 2024, doi: 10.52202/079017-4450.

[16] Y. You, T. Chen, Y. Sui, T. Chen, Z. Wang, and Y. Shen, “Graph Yue, X., & Zhu, R. (2024). An explainable hybrid machine learning framework for cash-flow-conditioned multi-horizon liquidity risk early warning: An SME-oriented benchmark study. World Journal of Management Science, 2(1), 63-72.

[17] Jiao, Y., & Liang, Y. (2024). An integrated process mining and explainable machine learning framework for bottleneck and internal control risk detection in the multi entity financial close. Social Science and Management, 1(3), 96-107.

[18] Bian, M., Wang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2024). Explainable supplier risk prediction for critical telecommunications infrastructure procurement: An empirical XGBoost–SHAP framework. Social Science and Management, 1(1), 64-77.

[19] Liang, Y., & Jiao, Y. (2024). Real-time financial fraud detection using a feature-light temporal dynamic graph neural network with contrastive learning. Journal of Trends in Finance and Economics, 1(1), 76–84.

[20] Shang, W., & Chen, T. (2024). PrefixKD-Edge: Real-time locomotion-intent prediction with prefix self-distillation on lightweight temporal networks. Innovation and Technology Studies, 1(1), 30–38.

[21] Rhee, M., Zou, J., & Qin, Y. (2024). CLARITY: A closed loop framework for duplicate aware failure prediction and budgeted automated remediation in cloud infrastructure. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 76-85.

[22] Zhang, C., & Wang, Y. (2024). A data-driven multi-objective production scheduling framework for battery pack manufacturing under material arrival uncertainty. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 86–93.

[23] Lin, Y., Wang, Y., & Bian, M. (2024). XOR EW: An explainable and cost aware artificial intelligence framework for operational risk early warning in financial institutions. AI and Data Science Journal, 1(1), 94-102.

[24] Zhao, W., & Wang, B. (2022). CAPA: A prediction‑driven autoscaling framework for SLO‑aware cloud‑native machine learning inference. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 4(1), 8-16.

[25] Fang, Q., & Liu, W. (2025). HARLA-ED: Resolving Information Asymmetry and Enhancing Algorithmic Symmetry in Intelligent Educational Assessment via Hybrid Reinforcement Learning. Symmetry, 18(1), 58.

[26] Xing, S., & Wang, Y. (2025). Cross-modal attention networks for multi-modal anomaly detection in system software. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society.

[27] Wang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2023). AERIS: Adaptive executor scoped resource management for privacy preserving data processing in Apache Spark. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2), 25-33.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-17