Morphology-Aware Block Sparsification for Low-Resource Translation

Authors

  • Ayumi Goto
  • Shota Honda

Keywords:

Neural Machine Translation, Low-Resource Languages, Network Sparsification, Morphological Analysis, Model Compression

Abstract

The rapid advancement of neural machine translation has historically relied on the availability of massive parallel corpora and increasingly large over-parameterized models. However, scaling these architectures poses significant challenges for low-resource languages, which often feature rich morphology and limited training data. In such resource-constrained scenarios, massive models tend to overfit, while deploying them on edge devices remains computationally prohibitive. Model compression techniques, particularly network sparsification, offer a promising solution to reduce memory footprint and improve inference speed. Yet, conventional magnitude-based and unstructured sparsification methods are language-agnostic and frequently disrupt the intricate morphological representations essential for translating morphologically rich languages. This paper introduces a novel morphology-aware block sparsification strategy designed specifically for low-resource translation. By integrating linguistic priors derived from morphological segmentation into the block sparsity scoring mechanism, the proposed framework strategically preserves parameter clusters responsible for morphological inflection, derivation, and syntactic agreement. We formalize this approach through a dynamically weighted masking function and evaluate it on several low-resource language pairs. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms traditional sparsification baselines in translation quality, preserving structural linguistic integrity while achieving substantial reductions in model size and computational overhead. The findings highlight the critical importance of incorporating linguistic structures into model compression paradigms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Zhao, R., Tang, J., Zeng, W., Chen, Z., & Zhao, X. (2024, October). Zero-shot knowledge graph question generation via multi-agent llms and small models synthesis. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 3341-3351).

2. Huang, Y., Thede, L., Mancini, M., Xu, W., & Akata, Z. (2025, September). Investigating structural pruning and recovery techniques for compressing multimodal large language models: An empirical study. In DAGM german conference on pattern recognition (pp. 320-336). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

3. Zhang, W., & Pei, S. (2026). Predictive prefetching for retrieval-augmented generation. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. The Forty-third International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2026. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10686293

4. Sang, Y. (2025, July). Towards explainable rag: Interpreting the influence of retrieved passages on generation. In 2025 4th International Conference on Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Control (RAIIC) (pp. 397-400). IEEE.

5. Sang, Y. (2025, October). AutoCrit: A Meta-Reasoning Framework for Self-Critique and Iterative Error Correction in LLM Chains-of-Thought. In 2025 6th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA) (pp. 1177-1180). IEEE.

6. Tang, J., Wang, Z., Gong, Z., Yu, J., Zhu, X., & Yin, J. (2025, April). Multi-grained query-guided set prediction network for grounded multimodal named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 39, No. 24, pp. 25246-25254).

7. Tang, J., Yang, Y., Yu, J., Wang, Z. X., Liang, H., Yao, L., & Yin, J. (2025, November). Unco: Uncertainty-driven collaborative framework of large and small models for grounded multimodal ner. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 7644-7662).

8. Zhang, Y., Zhao, M., Zhang, Y., & Cheung, Y. M. (2025). Trending applications of large language models: A user perspective survey. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence.

9. Jiang, J., Yang, P., Zhang, R., & Liu, F. (2026, July). Towards efficient large language model serving: A survey on system-aware kv cache optimization. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 (pp. 38450-38476).

10. Zhu, D., Xie, C., Zhang, H., Wei, Z., Wang, Z., Shi, J., ... & Xie, Q. (2026). Standalone LLM and a Pre-specified Agentic Pipeline for Explaining ICU Mortality Predictions: a Feasibility Study on the eICU Demo Dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.26109.

11. Qiu, Z., Qiu, K., Lyu, H., Xiong, W., & Luo, J. (2024, December). Semantics preserving emoji recommendation with large language models. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (pp. 7131-7140). IEEE.

12. Wang, H., Xu, Q., Liu, C., Wu, J., Lin, F., & Chen, W. (2026, April). Emergent hierarchical reasoning in llms through reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations (Vol. 2026, pp. 74519-74543).

13. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

14. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.

15. Cho, K., van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of EMNLP.

16. Zhao, R., Xu, D., Jian, S., Tan, T., Sun, X., & Zhang, W. (2023, July). Quadratic Exponential Decrease Roll-Back: An Efficient Gradient Update Mechanism in Proximal Policy Optimization. In 2023 2nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Cloud Computing and Intelligent Mining (MLCCIM) (pp. 65-70). IEEE.

17. Li, Q., Ye, Q., Zhang, N., Zhang, W., & Hu, F. (2025). Digital-twin-enabled industrial IoT: Vision, framework, and future directions. IEEE Wireless Communications, 32(6), 173-181.

18. Wang, S., Zhang, X., Wang, P., & Li, X. (2026). Design of Magnetic Sensor Array-Based PUFs for IoT Security. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 75, 1-9.

19. Li, X., Wang, P., Li, G., Ni, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Design of interface circuits and lightweight PUF for TMR sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(11), 11754-11761.

20. Li, X., Yang, F., Chen, L., & Cai, H. (2016, July). Saliency transfer: An example-based method for salient object detection. In IJCAI (pp. 3411-3417).

21. Zhao, J., Zhang, C., Qin, M., & Yang, P. (2025). QuantFactor REINFORCE: mining steady formulaic alpha factors with variance-bounded REINFORCE. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 73, 2448-2463.

22. Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Kim, E. H., & Fu, Z. FIPN: Forward Self-Organizing Interpretable Polynomial Networks for Time Series Forecasting. In Forty-third International Conference on Machine Learning.

23. Lin, Y., Yao, Y., Zhu, J., & He, C. (2025, July). Application of generative AI in predictive analysis of urban energy distribution and traffic congestion in smart cities. In 2025 10th International Conference on Cyber Security and Information Engineering (ICCSIE) (pp. 620-623). IEEE.

24. Yao, J., Yao, C., Chen, Y., Liu, X., Huang, D., & Chu, W. (2026, April). Explainable AI Enhanced Traffic Forecasting for Proactive Autonomous Vehicle Routing. In 2026 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

25. Huhle, T., Torun, O., Song, W., & Breuil, C. (2026, June). Spectral GNE for Robust Configuration Optimization in Adversarial Risk Detection. In 2026 7th International Conference on Big Data & Artificial Intelligence & Software Engineering (ICBASE) (pp. 406-410). IEEE.

26. Ullah, H., Ayaz, U., & Shah, S. S. A. (2026). Machine Learning Predicts, But Does It Explain? Causality in Biochar Research. Journal of Machine Learning Advances, 1(1), 1-19.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-15